Dhesy
Creator CurationBrand InsightsPPL ReferencesMissed Million+ VideosPopular VideosTrend KeywordsBlog

음식 상위 10채널 중 7개는 협업 0% — 쯔양만 25%인데 조회수 차이는 1%

음식 구독자 상위 10채널 중 7개는 협업 비율 0%인데, 1,310만 구독자 쯔양만 25%입니다. 협찬 영상 평균 조회수 153만과 비협찬 152만이 동일한 비결을 44건 영상과 11개 브랜드 데이터로 분석합니다.

음식 카테고리 상위 10채널 중 7개가 협업 비율 0%인 상황에서, 쯔양의 25%(11건)는 나머지 9개 채널 합계(6건)를 넘는 독보적 수치입니다.

협찬 영상 평균 조회수 153만과 비협찬 152만은 사실상 동일하며, 이는 호기심 기반 제목 전략과 포맷 통합의 결과입니다.

비식품 브랜드(가전, 금융, 배달앱) 협업 평균 조회수가 식품 브랜드보다 1.6배 높아, 크로스 카테고리 전략의 효과를 보여줍니다.

ASMR 중심의 대형 음식 채널은 포맷 특성상 브랜드 협업이 구조적으로 어려우며, 이야기 기반 포맷이 상업적 확장성을 결정합니다.

Home/Blog/Creator Analysis
Creator Analysis

7 of Top 10 Food Channels Have Zero Brand Deals — Tzuyang Has 25%, Yet Views Stay the Same

Dhesy·April 11, 2026
7 of Top 10 Food Channels Have Zero Brand Deals — Tzuyang Has 25%, Yet Views Stay the Same

Key Takeaways

  • · 음식 카테고리 상위 10채널 중 7개가 협업 비율 0%인 상황에서, 쯔양의 25%(11건)는 나머지 9개 채널 합계(6건)를 넘는 독보적 수치입니다.
  • · 협찬 영상 평균 조회수 153만과 비협찬 152만은 사실상 동일하며, 이는 호기심 기반 제목 전략과 포맷 통합의 결과입니다.
  • · 비식품 브랜드(가전, 금융, 배달앱) 협업 평균 조회수가 식품 브랜드보다 1.6배 높아, 크로스 카테고리 전략의 효과를 보여줍니다.
  • · ASMR 중심의 대형 음식 채널은 포맷 특성상 브랜드 협업이 구조적으로 어려우며, 이야기 기반 포맷이 상업적 확장성을 결정합니다.

Contents

  • 7 of the Top 10 Food Channels Have Zero Brand Deals
  • Korea's Most-Loved YouTuber
  • Key Metrics vs. Category Average
  • Why Sponsored Views Don't Drop
  • Non-Food Brands Outperform Food Brands
  • When This Strategy Doesn't Work
  • Takeaways for Marketers
  • FAQ

Dhesy analyzed the top 10 food channels by subscribers over three months and found that Tzuyang's brand deal ratio of 25% was 14 times higher than the average of the other nine channels (1.8%). Her sponsored video average of 1.53M views was virtually identical to her non-sponsored average of 1.52M.

7 of the Top 10 Food Channels Have Zero Brand Deals

Tzuyang's 11 brand deals in three months exceed the combined total (6) of the other nine channels.

The top 10 food channels by subscribers on YouTube Korea are DONA (33.6M), Jane ASMR (18.4M), Hongyu ASMR (16.8M), Seulgi (16.3M), GONGSAM TABLE (15.4M), Hamzy (14.1M), Tzuyang (13.1M), Ssoyoung (12.3M), SIO ASMR (11.1M), and Eat with Boki (10.9M). By subscriber count, Tzuyang ranks seventh.

The brand deal data paints a different picture. DONA, Jane, Hongyu, Seulgi, GONGSAM TABLE, Hamzy, and SIO — all seven have 0% brand deal ratios. Ssoyoung has 6.7% (2 deals), Boki has 9.5% (4 deals). Tzuyang has 25% (11 deals).

음식 카테고리 상위 10채널 협업 비율

* Source: Dhesy

The reason is format. Five of the top seven channels are ASMR. When sound is the core product, brand messaging has no structural entry point. Tzuyang's format is different — restaurant tours, eating challenges, daily vlogs. There's narrative, and brands fit naturally within it.

Korea's Most-Loved YouTuber

Tzuyang (real name Park Jeong-won) started YouTube in 2018. Her mega-portion mukbang format has built 13.1M subscribers and 3.6 billion total views. In 2024, a Gallup Korea survey named her the number one most-liked YouTuber in South Korea.

What sets her channel apart is that brands become the story, not background noise. How many plates can she clear at a Kookookoo buffet? How many convenience store items can she finish? The brand itself becomes the challenge. GS25 recognized this by launching the "Tzuyang Mega Eater Series," a private-label product line built around her identity.

Key Metrics vs. Category Average

Tzuyang's three-month data compared to the food category top channel average.

MetricTzuyangTop 20 Food AvgMultiple
3-Month Avg Views1.56M399K3.9x
Brand Deal Ratio25%3.2%7.8x
Brand Deals (3 months)111.66.9x
Engagement Rate2.0%1.3%1.5x

The subscriber gap is just 1.2x, but the brand deal ratio is 7.8x. This reveals how uniquely positioned Tzuyang is as a commercial partner in the food category.

Why Sponsored Views Don't Drop

Sponsored videos typically underperform organic content. The "Paid promotion" label causes viewer drop-off, and lower engagement hurts algorithmic distribution.

Tzuyang's data defies this pattern.

TypeVideosAvg ViewsAvg ER
Sponsored111,538,2102.18%
Non-Sponsored331,529,4202.59%

The view count ratio is 1.01x — effectively identical. Engagement rate is 0.4 percentage points lower for sponsored content, but this hasn't translated into a view penalty.

The key is title strategy. Only 1 of 11 sponsored videos includes the brand name in the title. "How many plates can I eat at an unlimited buffet?" and "Mom caught me grilling 3kg of meat at home" — the curiosity-driven structure is identical to non-sponsored videos.

무한리필 뷔페에서 몇접시 먹었을까..? xx접시?! 쿠우쿠우 다 털었습니다

무한리필 뷔페에서 몇접시 먹었을까..? xx접시?! 쿠우쿠우 다 털었습니다

tzuyang쯔양·조회수 273만

The highest-performing sponsored video was the Kookookoo buffet challenge (2.72M views). The "how many plates" hook leads the title, with the brand name placed at the end. It earned 41,400 likes and 1,534 comments.

Non-Food Brands Outperform Food Brands

You might assume a food channel works only with food brands. The data says otherwise.

쯔양 협업 브랜드 유형별 평균 조회수

* Source: Dhesy

CategoryBrandsAvg Views
Food Brands61,202,320
Non-Food Brands51,941,277

Non-food brands (Yogiyo delivery app, Woori Bank, Buan County, JisaengJiwel home appliances, Yangpo Port) averaged 1.6x more views than food brands.

엄마 몰래 집에서 고기 3kg 구워먹다가 걸렸습니다..

엄마 몰래 집에서 고기 3kg 구워먹다가 걸렸습니다..

tzuyang쯔양·조회수 263만

"Mom caught me grilling 3kg of meat at home" was sponsored by JisaengJiwel, a home appliance brand. It earned 2.62M views. The title frames it as a mukbang story, while the video naturally features a mini range hood and steam cleaner. The mukbang format creates usage context for non-food products.

양을 이렇게 많이 준다고요..? 분식집 털었더니 사장님께 박수받았습니다

양을 이렇게 많이 준다고요..? 분식집 털었더니 사장님께 박수받았습니다

tzuyang쯔양·조회수 173만

A Woori Bank history museum visit (1.72M views) follows the same pattern — large portions at a local restaurant, with the bank sponsorship woven naturally into the story.

When This Strategy Doesn't Work

Tzuyang's data is compelling, but generalizing requires caution.

This model depends on the mega-eater persona. Viewers come for the sheer volume of food consumed, and brands get exposure in the process. Copying the format without the character anchor would likely produce different results.

Whether 25% is sustainable remains unclear. At 11 of 44 videos, that's roughly one sponsored video per week. Pushing the ratio higher could trigger viewer fatigue.

The comparison to ASMR channels also needs nuance. ASMR structurally cannot integrate brands — those channels don't choose not to do deals, they can't. Tzuyang's results reflect format selection as much as individual execution.

Takeaways for Marketers

For advertisers, the lesson is to work within a creator's existing format rather than requesting standalone reviews. Non-food brands outperformed food brands because the unexpectedness of their appearance in a food context became content value itself.

For creators, maintaining views at high collaboration rates comes down to titles. Only 9% of Tzuyang's sponsored titles (1 of 11) included the brand name. Applying the same curiosity-driven framework to sponsored content prevents the ad penalty.

FAQ

Q. What is Tzuyang's estimated sponsorship rate?

A. Based on Dhesy data, Tzuyang's estimated CPV (cost per view) is approximately KRW 3,761, with an estimated per-video rate of around KRW 5.66 million. Actual rates vary by contract.

Q. What industries does Tzuyang partner with most?

A. Of 11 deals in three months, 6 were food brands (55%) and 5 were non-food (45%) — including a delivery app (Yogiyo), banking (Woori Bank), local government (Buan County), and home appliances (JisaengJiwel).

Q. Do other large food channels do brand deals?

A. Among the top 10 food channels, only Eat with Boki (4 deals, 9.5%) and Ssoyoung (2 deals, 6.7%) have any. The remaining seven have 0%.

Q. Is Tzuyang's sponsored engagement rate lower than non-sponsored?

A. Engagement rate is 2.18% for sponsored and 2.59% for non-sponsored — a 0.4pp gap. However, view counts are virtually identical: 1.53M sponsored vs 1.52M non-sponsored.


Methodology: Based on Dhesy platform data covering 2,326 brands and 5,997 collaborations. Analysis period: January 11 to April 11, 2026. Data source: Dhesy External sources: Gallup Korea (2024 YouTuber preference survey), InsightKorea (GS25-Tzuyang collaboration report) Last updated: April 11, 2026

You Might Also Like

구독자 1,090만 먹방 채널의 협찬이 월 1건인 이유

음식 TOP 10 중 7채널이 협찬 0% — 구독자 1,630만 설기양 데이터로 본 ASMR 먹방의 협찬 역설

구독자 1,230만인데 협찬 조회수는 37% — 쏘영의 글로벌 팬 역설

CJ제일제당 협찬 50편 분석, 같은 회사가 SKU마다 다른 페르소나를 골랐습니다

이삭토스트 프렌치 브리오슈, 풍향고2에서 핑계고로 — 1,532만 뷰가 함께 본 신메뉴

서울시보다 조회수 1.6배, 평균 47.9만 — 농림축산식품부가 먹방 크리에이터를 선택한 이유

Related Pages

쿠우쿠우 →좋은생활지웰 →요기요 →우리은행 →부안군 →tzuyang쯔양 →
#쯔양협찬분석#TzuyangSponsoredContent#먹방유튜브마케팅#MukbangYouTubeMarketing#유튜브협찬조회수#YouTubeSponsoredViews#음식크리에이터협업#FoodCreatorCollaboration#인플루언서마케팅데이터#InfluencerMarketingData
Share this article